Compare
Delagents and Lindy
Lindy lets you build an assistant from triggers and actions or start from a template, and confirms steps along the way. Delagents starts from the brief and makes the sign-off the shared, recorded centre of the work. This comparison is a snapshot from public pages as of September 2026; verify before you decide.
| Dimension | Lindy | Delagents |
|---|---|---|
| How work is described | Build a Lindy from triggers and actions, or start from a template | Write a brief that describes the outcome. An agent on staff plans and runs it, stopping at checkpoints you set and at a floor nobody can loosen. |
| Human in the loop | Confirmation steps per action; no shared approval queue that we could find | A shared approvals Inbox is the centre of the product: exact action, preview, cost, who else can decide, and an audit record of every sign-off. |
| Integrations | Broad, partly through third-party connector platforms | Curated depth for the eight roster roles first; per-agent scopes; MCP import for the long tail on the roadmap |
| Pricing model | Free tier, then credit-based tiers | Seats plus usage credits. Starter is free; Team and Business add the builder, budgets, audit export and API. |
| Ideal user | Solo operators and SMBs automating personal workflows | Founders, small team leads and agencies handing agents real accounts |
Choose Lindy if
- You want one personal assistant wired to your own tools quickly
- You prefer configuring triggers to writing briefs
- A team-wide approval record is not a requirement
Choose Delagents if
- Several people delegate and several people can approve
- You need every external action to stop for a person and be recorded
- You want cost per step and budget caps visible before you say yes
Product names belong to their owners. Descriptions summarise public pages at the date above and may be out of date. Tell us at hello@delagents.com if something here is wrong and we will fix it.
Hand it off.
Your first delegation takes a minute. Your first sign-off takes a second.